Facebook   Twitter   Youtube   Vimeo

The Bible is Trustworthy and We Can Stake Our Eternal Destines Upon its Message

I want to answer a Facebook question from David. Here’s his question, he asks, “Can anything involving human beings contain the inerrant Word of God”?

 

The short answer to that question is “yes.” It’s true that humans are fallible vessels that they’re prone to error, but that in no way precludes the inerrancy of the Bible. All Scripture is God breathed. All Scripture is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work (2 Tim. 3:16-17). The Apostle Paul there puts a very significant premium of the accuracy of all Scripture.

 

The Apostle Peter does essentially the same thing. He says that prophecy never had its origin in the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.

 

The doctrine of inspiration tells us that God did something miraculous in inspiration. He worked through fallible human prophets, He utilized their individual personalities, all to pen what is authoritative, infallible, and sacred as Scripture. In fact we can demonstrate that the Bible is divine as opposed to human in origin. If you look just at archeology, you find what is concealed in the soil, corresponds to what is revealed in the Scriptures, and that with minute precision. I’m talking about people, and places, even particulars. So we know, we have evidence that the Bible corresponds to reality, and therefore it is truth, and a miracle—the miracle of infallible inspiration, the inspiration that comes from the Holy Spirit.

 

Now we don’t suppose that the disciples walked around with tape recorders, or we’re programmed automatons, but what we do suppose is that the believers who are used by God to pen the Scriptures captured the essential voice of God in the Scripture. Not the exact words they heard. For example, if you look at the Sermon on the Mount, you’ll see that there are various versions of the Sermon on the Mount given by Mark, Matthew, and Luke. And you see that the Sermon on the Mount is given in a different way but is essentially the same, because through their own personalities Matthew and Luke capture the essential voice of Jesus not the exact verbiage that Jesus used, and that’s why there can be differences and yet complete agreement because there’s no difference in the message that is being communicated in either case.

 

The bottom line is this: Our Bibles are trustworthy and true, so trustworthy we can stake our eternal destinies on the message that our Bibles proclaim.

 

More Questions and Answers with Hank

I Died, and Behold I am Alive Forevermore

Q&A: Lordship Salvation, Witnessing to Muslims, and the Sin Leading to Death

Responding to the Gay Rights Movement and Q&A

The Great Evangelical Recession with John Dickerson – Part 2

Holy Week and Q&A

Best of BAM: Q&A: Isaiah 65:20, The Millennium, and Soul Sleep

Q&A: False Teachers, Understanding Scripture, and the Problem of Evil

The Great Evangelical Recession with John Dickerson – Part 1

Headed Toward the Secularism of Europe and Q&A

The Cultural Free-fall and Q&A

The Most Important Kind of Christian, and Q&A

Best of BAM: Erased from Space and Consciousness with Gary Burge, and Q&A

No Tolerance for Religion and Q&A

Q&A: Isaiah 65:20, the Age of the Earth, and Sin in Heaven

Q&A: Christian Zionism, Tattoos, and Immortality

MENU