Despite certain elements of the accounts of King David in the Hebrew Bible appearing to be legendary, there are several intriguing sources that strongly suggest that David existed and founded a dynasty and that David’s kingdom was more than a myth. Textual sources written from the perspective of the enemies of Israel and Judah mention the “house of David,” a clear reference to David as a dynastic founder. While direct, physical evidence (ie.—“David was here”) is lacking, archaeological data from key sites points towards the activity of a king or strong central authority. Additionally, David established his kingdom precisely during a power vacuum in the ancient Near East region. Thus, the overall picture paints David as a historical figure, and biblical accounts of his kingdom are plausible.
This Postmodern Realities episode is a conversation with Journal author Mark D Janzen about his online-exclusive feature article “The Firm Foundations of the House of David: A Defense of King David’s Historicity”.
We’d also like to invite you to subscribe to the Journal. To subscribe to the Journal, please click here.
When you to subscribe to the Journal, you join the team of print subscribers whose paid subscriptions help provide the resources at equip.org that minister to people worldwide. These resources include our free online-exclusive articles, such as this review, as well as our free Postmodern Realities podcast.
Another way you can support keeping our resources free is by leaving us a tip. A tip is just a small amount, like $3 or $5, which is the cost for some of a latte, lunch out, or coffee drink. To leave a tip, click here.
Other articles and Postmodern Realities podcasts related to this topic:
Making a Case for the Historicity of Moses
Episode 119 The Historicity of Moses
Historical Artifacts and Biblical Sources: Determining What Is True
Bible Reliability: M-A-P-S to Guide You through Bible Reliability
Biblical Archaeology: Factual Evidence to Support the Historicity of the Bible
Biblical History: The Faulty Criticism of Biblical Historicity